iPhone 16e 512GB Prices On Optus Plans

iPhone 16e 512GB Review

The iPhone 16e is a good iPhone, albeit not a particularly exciting one. While recent Apple devices like the new Mac mini are impressive enough that they could sway Windows users to change their loyalties, the iPhone 16e doesn’t have that same energy. It isn’t going to have Android users flocking to switch.

This isn’t because of any fatal flaw or omission. It’s just one of those situations where the math doesn’t math. You cut a few corners here and there to bring the price down and make a more affordable product, but you end up with one that has less of an identity. The iPhone 16e feels built to hit a price point rather than to surprise and delight.

A little old, a little new

The iPhone 16e technically replaces the 2022 iPhone SE as the most affordable iPhone in Apple’s family. Despite this, I think a better comparison is the iPhone XR from 2018. It was a cheaper flagship, rather than a “budget” device like the iPhone SE. For a more modern reference, it’s similar to how Samsung sells an “FE” model of its Galaxy S series flagships that is cheaper, but more exactly cheap.

This isn’t important, because the iPhone 16e starts at $999, while the last iPhone SE was priced at $719. $280 isn’t an insignificant difference, but while the iPhone 16e is more expensive, it’s better value.

Some may have loved the classic iPhone SE design - home button and all - but even in 2022, it was downright anachronistic. Using a tiny 4.7-inch display surrounded by bezel felt limiting. Reading long-form articles, watching videos, and even just trying to look up restaurants made me long for a larger screen.

This time around, Apple is effectively recycling the iPhone 14 design. It has a larger 6.1-inch screen, which while still on the smaller side for phones, is more functional. Touch ID has been replaced by Face ID, but it’s housed in a notch, rather than the dynamic island introduced on the iPhone 14 Pro. It may not be Apple’s latest and greatest, but it’s a lot more modern.

But despite these welcome changes, the iPhone 16e doesn’t quite fit into the iPhone 16 family from a design perspective. The bezels surrounding the display are larger, and it’s missing the softer contoured frame from the latest models. These are hardly deal breakers, but like I said, little things add up.

Another cut is MagSafe. Apple’s handsets supported MagSafe accessories since the iPhone 12 and its spawned a fun little ecosystem of knicknacks and doodads that can span to your phone. There are the obvious wireless charging solutions and stands, but then there are things like car mounts and X. I tend not to use wireless charging, but I love having a MagSafe car mount. It’s one less step to think about when you get in the car, and that’s great.

It’s weird that Apple would axe such a unique feature to shave off a few dollars in manufacturing costs. There’s a whole cottage industry of adapters that are designed to let you use MagSafe products with Android phones. It’s an Apple exclusive that people love, that’s missing for some reason.

Solid foundations

When we get into the more traditional hardware aspects, a lot of what’s on offer is fantastic. 

You’ve got a similar A18 processor to that found in the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus. It has one less graphic core, but is otherwise identical. There’s very little to complain about with the performance. The standard iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro will be able to achieve better frame rates with demanding tasks like gaming, but even AAA titles like Death Stranding and Assassin’s Creed are still perfectly playable on the iPhone 16e.

Battery life is also excellent. Expect up to eight hours of screen time per charge when connected to a 5G mobile network. That’s an hour more than we were getting on the standard iPhone 16, and similar to what we got on the iPhone 16 Pro Max. With moderate use, expected as much as two days of battery life per charge. It’s a seriously great battery.

Part of the reason for the better battery life is a larger physical battery. The iPhone 16e battery is around 400mAh larger than what you’ll find in the iPhone 16e. In addition, the iPhone 16e is also Apple’s first device to use an in-house modem, which the company says is more efficient than the one found in the rest of the iPhone 16 family. Despite the change, I didn’t experience meaningful differences in cellular connectivity when testing the iPhone 16e.

The iPhone 16e continues the iPhone SE tradition of having just a single camera, but thankfully it’s pretty good. The sole rear-facing camera is a 48MP lens that’s similar to what you’ll find in the standard iPhone 16, but with a smaller pixel size. In good lighting, you won’t be able to tell photos from the iPhone 16e and iPhone 16 apart. In lower light, the smaller pixel size makes more of a difference. Night time shots from the iPhone 16e are noticeably grainier, and in some cases, less detailed. You may not always notice this unless you’re pixel peeping or looking on a larger display, but it’s still worth keeping in mind.

The lack of secondary lenses is unusual for a phone this expensive, but it also means less versatility. While you can do what’s effectively 2x optical zoom, there are no options for ultra-wide photography. This means you also can’t take macro shots. Another little wrinkle is that the lack of second lens means a worse portrait mode, as the phone isn’t able to estimate depth as accurately. I also found the iPhone 16e took a longer time to actually recognise and lock on to my subject when taking portrait mode photos.

Apple iPhone 16e camera samples

---

Check out these camera samples taken on the iPhone 16e. Click or tap on any photo to see a larger version. 

One other missing feature is the upgraded photographic styles introduced on the rest of the iPhone 16 family. These are filter-like adjustments that happen before you shoot, and give you much more control over the vibe of your photo. You can personalise your images to an insane degree, and in a sense, it gives users a way to address criticisms like iPhone photos sometimes looking too flat. Given this is software, it doesn’t feel like the kind of thing that should be missing on the iPhone 16.

The one actual hardware disappointment is the display. While the panel itself is lovely - it has bright colours, deep blacks, and great viewability - the refresh rate issue is becoming embarrassing. Like the standard iPhone 16, the iPhone 16e has a 60Hz refresh rate. Faster refresh rates have become the standard across the phone industry, and even Android phones as cheap as $300 consistently include this feature.

Higher refresh rate displays make all motion on a phone look smoother. After using phones with high refresh rates for years now, the 60Hz screen on the iPhone 16e is laggy to my eyes. Sure, this won’t be an issue for everyone - especially if you’re upgrading from an older iPhone - but the absence means Apple isn’t keeping pace with what the competition has at this price point.

Of course, there are a few unique features Apple has extended to the iPhone 16e. It gets features like emergency satellite connectivity and car crash detection. These are great initiatives and certainly welcome to have, but I don’t know if you’d call them selling points for the average customer.

The iPhone 16e also has an action button instead of a physical mute switch. By default, the action button toggles the phone between silent and loud, but it can be customised. Your out-of-the-box options are pretty standard tasks like turning on the torch or opening the translate app. If you’re a bit more adventurous and familiar with Apple’s shortcut system, you can use the action button to pretty much do anything.

Lastly, the iPhone 16e naturally supports Apple Intelligence, but it’s too early to call that a selling point. And as I said in my Galaxy S25 Ultra review, if everyone is doing AI, it becomes par for the course rather than a feature you need to buy a certain device to get.

Apple iPhone 16e - Final Thoughts

The iPhone 16e is a much better entry-level iPhone than the iPhone SE, and it’s easy to recommend if you want a cheaper iPhone. The iPhone 16e makes less compromises than the iPhone SE did, making it a solid option for anyone looking to upgrade from an older device. (The current Vodafone promo where you can get it for $66.75 per month on a 36-month term with 100GB data is an especially good deal.)

While I would have liked a higher refresh rate screen (and a few other bells and whistles like MagSafe and the contoured frame), the iPhone 16e doesn’t have any red flags. The display is still nice, the processor is blazing fast, the battery is excellent, and the camera is only a small step below what you’d get from the standard iPhone 16.

This is all great, but it doesn’t stop me from believing Apple could have done more. When you look at the latest Macs, the entry-level models are genuinely exciting. The Mac mini is an engineering marvel and a bargain, the latest MacBook Pro’s cheapest configuration is Apple’s best baseline to date, and the brand new MacBook Air not only got better, it got cheaper.

Of course, Apple has to compete harder in the PC market. Windows machines still make up the majority of devices sold, so there’s more of an incentive to win. When it comes to phones, most of us have picked our sides, and we’re pretty rigid about it. If you want an iPhone, an Android isn’t going to do and vice versa.

But given how long pricing has been a barrier to entry, it’s easy to imagine the iPhone 16e could have been in a fresh volley in the phone wars. If it were even $150 cheaper or had just a little more going for it, it would have landed with the same kind of bang as the latest Macs.

As it stands, the new iPhone 16e is fine. It fits the brief, but it won’t change hearts and minds.